There is no definite conclusion in the traceability report of Meixin crown. Scholars: it's no good f

Singapore United Morning Post reported 29 out of the fact that the office of the director of national intelligence recently released a new confidential report on the new crown virus. Ma Zhaoxu, Vice Minister of foreign affairs, responded that China believed that it was out and out political report and false report, without scientific and credibility, and had solemnly made representations to the US side. However, the interviewed scholars believe that since the US intelligence agencies are unable to draw a definite conclusion on the origin of the virus, the Biden government has realized that there is no & ldquo; More benefits & rdquo;, But & ldquo; I won't give up this card & rdquo;.
Reported that, according to the United States National Intelligence Director's office in August 27th released a summary of COVID-19's non confidential report, the U.S. intelligence agency judged that the virus is not “ It is developed as a biological and chemical weapon;. Most institutions also believe that the virus does not come from genetic engineering; Moreover, China covid-19 had not previously known the virus before the outbreak of the new crown.
 
U.S. intelligence agencies disagree on the source of the virus, believing that humans naturally come into contact with infected animals and that the virus is related to the laboratory, & ldquo; Both assumptions are reasonable & rdquo;.
The interviewed scholars judged that because the US intelligence agencies could not draw a definite conclusion on the origin of the virus, there was a confrontation around the issue & ldquo; The page will turn & rdquo;.
In an interview with Lianhe Zaobao, Wu Xinbo, director of the American Research Center of Fudan University, judged that the Biden government would not continue to make a big fuss on this issue because the investigation of the US intelligence department did not reach a conclusion. He said: & ldquo; The United States will not give up this card, but it will not rush to the front;.

Data figure: US President Biden.
In an interview, Li Mingjiang, an associate professor at the Rajaratnam Institute of International Studies at Nanyang University of technology in Singapore, also pointed out that Biden's request for intelligence agencies to conduct a traceability investigation is to some extent to deal with hawks in the United States. Now the Biden team may have concluded that it will continue to struggle on this issue, & ldquo; No more benefits & rdquo;.
Li Mingjiang judged that the traceability investigation in the next stage is expected to be depoliticized and return to the scientific issues dominated by who.
For the second phase of the traceability survey, Wu Xinbo believes that China's position is that the who survey on China has been completed, and the second phase should be to investigate other countries, including the United States. China will also strive for more countries to support this proposition.
According to the website of the Ministry of foreign affairs, on August 28, Chinese Vice Foreign Minister Ma Zhaoxu said on the traceability investigation report issued by the US intelligence department that the so-called report is an out and out political report and false report, which has no scientificity and credibility. The US side also issued a statement to slander and attack China. China expresses firm opposition and has made solemn representations to the United States.