After Meng Wanzhou returned home, the Chinese representative had a verbal battle with the Canadian F

Original title: after Meng Wanzhou returned home, Chinese representatives fought with Canadian foreign ministers and diplomats at the UN General Assembly
[global network report] the general debate of the 76th United Nations General Assembly ended at the United Nations headquarters in New York on the 27th. In the general debate on the same day, Canadian Foreign Minister garno mentioned Meng Wanzhou and "two Michael", and also brought these events of different nature together to accuse China. Chinese diplomats refuted and counterattacked on the spot, and representatives of China and Canada had a fierce confrontation.

According to foreign media reports such as Canada's "global news" website and American cable news network (CNN), galno announced on the same day that Canada "applied domestic and international law" in response to the extradition of Meng Wanzhou by the United States, while Canada's commitment to the rule of law made the "two Michael" pay a "heavy price". "We oppose the way these two citizens are treated," garno said, adding that Canada "will never forget this experience".

After the foreign minister of Canada made a statement, the Chinese representative exercised the right of reply.
The report mentioned that a representative of the Chinese delegation to the United Nations said that Meng Wanzhou's case was "completely different" from the cases of the two Canadians. He accused the United States and Canada of arbitrarily detaining Meng Wanzhou as a "complete political event and persecution".
"We hope that Canada will face up to the facts, correct mistakes, draw lessons from them and don't add mistakes to mistakes," the representative said.
The representative of China said that a representative of the permanent mission of Canada to the United Nations also exercised the right of reply and responded to the statement made by the representative of China, but still ignored the facts.
The Canadian representative claimed that the "two Michael" did not "benefit from transparency, respect, due process or judicial independence" like Meng Wanzhou.
In this regard, the Chinese representative exercised the right of reply for the second time, said that he could not accept the statement made by the Canadian representative, and stressed: "the facts cannot be erased and the law cannot be blasphemed. We believe that history will make a correct judgment."
On September 25, Meng Wanzhou, chief financial officer of Huawei, arrived at Shenzhen Bao'an International Airport by a chartered plane of the Chinese government after nearly three years of illegal detention by Canada and returned to the motherland smoothly. Global Times - global network reporter learned from relevant departments on the 26th that Canadian defendants Kang Mingkai and Michael spaver applied for bail pending trial on the grounds of illness. Confirmed by relevant departments and diagnosed by professional medical institutions, and guaranteed by the Canadian ambassador to China, the second intermediate people's Court of Beijing and the higher people's Court of Liaoning Province, in accordance with articles 67 and 206 of the criminal procedure law of the people's Republic of China, respectively made a decision on Approving the release of bail pending trial and a ruling on suspending the trial of the two defendants on September 25, 2021, The security organ shall obtain a guarantor pending trial.

Many foreign media take this opportunity to hype the so-called "hostage diplomacy". In response to foreign media comparing "Meng Wanzhou's return" with "Canadians Kang Mingkai and Michael were released on bail according to law", Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Hua Chunying said at the regular press conference of the foreign ministry on September 27 that the nature of Meng Wanzhou's incident is completely different from that of Kang Mingkai and Michael's case. Meng Wanzhou incident is a political persecution against Chinese citizens in order to suppress China's high-tech enterprises. Kang Mingkai and Michael were suspected of crimes endangering China's national security. They applied for bail pending trial on the grounds of physical illness. After confirmation by relevant departments and diagnosis by professional medical institutions, and guaranteed by the Canadian ambassador to China, the relevant Chinese courts approved bail pending trial according to law, which shall be implemented by China's national security organs.